ESG ACTIVITIES AND BANK EFFICIENCY: ARE ISLAMIC BANKS BETTER?
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the differential impact of ESG activities on banks’ technical efficiency for conventional and Islamic banks. We employ a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique to determine the efficiency scores of the banks. Based on a sample of 14 conventional and 11 Islamic banks from 4 countries over the period 2011 - 2019, we find that average DEA-generated efficiency of conventional (Islamic) banks is about 38.8% (42.45%). Baseline Tobit regressions suggest that ESG has an overall positive impact on banks’ efficiency. Further, we analyze the relationship for conventional and Islamic banks separately. We find that the positive effect sustains for conventional banks but turns out to be insignificant for Islamic banks. Our individual ESG dimension-wise analyses suggest that environmental activities positively influence the efficiency of both conventional and Islamic banks, whereas social activities strengthen the efficiency of conventional banks only. We do not find any significant result in favor of governance-related initiatives. Our baseline results survive the robustness test based on Simar and Wilson (2007) two-stage efficiency analysis. Based on our findings, we argue that Islamic banks lack sufficient investment on ESG friendly initiatives. We recommend that Islamic banks increase their awareness of the benefits of ESG practices and pay attention to improve their overall and dimension-wise ESG scores with a goal to improve their banking efficiency.
References
Ahamed, M. M., Ho, S. J., Mallick, S. K., & Matousek, R. (2021). Inclusive banking, financial regulation and bank performance: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 124(March), 106055.
Alam, A. W., Banna, H., & Hassan, M. K. (2021). The role of ESG performance in banking efficiency: International evidence. Unpublished working paper.
Albuquerque, R., Durnev, A., & Koskinen, Y. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and asset pricing in industry equilibrium. SSRN 1961971.
Azmi, W., Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., & Karim, M. S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money, 70(January), 101277.
Baker, E. D., Boulton, T. J., Braga-Alves, M. V., & Morey, M. R. (2021). ESG government risk and international IPO underpricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67(April), 101913.
Banna, H., Shah, S. K. B., Noman, A. H. M., Ahmad, R., & Masud, M. M. (2019). Determinants of Sino-ASEAN Banking Efficiency: How do countries differ? Economies, 7(1), 13-35.
Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(1), 98-115.
Cao, J., Titman, S., Zhan, X. E., & Zhang, W. E. (2018). ESG preference and market efficiency: Evidence from mispricing and institutional trading. Unpublished working paper (p.1-57).
Duque-Grisales, E. & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2021). ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: Concavity-convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1929807
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38(November), 45-64.
Forgione, A. F., Laguir, I., & Stagliano, R. (2020). Effect of corporate social responsibility score on bank efficiency: The moderating role of institutional context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2094-2106.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Stakeholder management: A strategic approach. Marchfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193–238.
Gillan, S., Hartzell, J. C., Koch, A., & Starks, L. (2010). Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation. Unpublished working paper.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Kumar, N. C. A., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: A new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 6(4), 292-300.
La Torre, M., Mango, F., Cafaro, A., & Leo, S. (2020). Does ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50, Sustainability, 12(16), 6387-6398.
Miralles-Quiros, M. M., Miralles-Quiros, J. L., & Hernandez, J. R. (2019). ESG performance and shareholder value creation in the banking industry: International differences. Sustainability, 11(5), 1404-1418.
Mure, P., Spallone, M., Mango, F., Marzioni, S., & Bittucci, L. (2020). ESG and reputation: The case of sanctioned Italian banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 265-277.
Nizam, E., Ng, A., Dewandaru, G., Nagayev, R., & Nkoba, M. A. (2019). The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: A global analysis of the banking sector. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49(C), 35-53.
Ouenniche, J., & Carrales, S. (2018). Assessing efficiency profiles of U.K. commercial banks: A DEA analysis with regression-based feedback. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1), 551-587.
Pradhan, M., Alam, A. W., Banna, H., & Hassan, M. K. (2021). Global banking stability in light of ESG performance. Unpublished working paper.
Qoyum, A., Sakti, M. R. P., Thaker, H. M. T., & AlHashfi, L. U. (2021). Does the Islamic label indicate good environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance? Evidence from Sharia-compliant firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Borsa Istanbul Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.001
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Shair, F., Shaorong, S., Kamran, H. W., Hussain, M. S., Nawaz, M. A., & Nguyen, V. C. (2021). Assessing the efficiency and total factor productivity growth of the banking industry: Do environmental concerns matters? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16), 20822-20838.
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569-592.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31-64.
Tasnia, M., Alhabshi, S. M. S. J., & Rosman, R. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and Islamic and conventional banks performance: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922063
Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
