SOVEREIGN DEBT ISSUANCE CHOICE: SUKUK VS CONVENTIONAL BONDS
This paper investigates the determinants and their factors that affect governments’ decision to employ sovereign Sukuk over conventional bonds; the research is based on a sample of 143 Sukuk and 602 conventional sovereign bonds issued in 16 OIC countries from 2000 to 2015. The results depict that more nations that have developed financial markets, higher credit quality, and strong economic/financial prospects, issue sovereign Sukuk rather than sovereign conventional bonds. Dealing with Sukuk bonds can be a strategy to diversify and develop current debt markets by introducing newly-developed debt tools. However, less economically developed nations countries are typically issuing insurance for classic sovereign bonds. Our findings suggest that a government’s choice of sovereign debt is influenced mainly from national financial and macroeconomic indicators, as well as specific events. Countries with developed financial markets, strong economic indicators, high credit quality, and sustainable financial position are more likely to issue sovereign Sukuk rather than sovereign bonds as a strategy to develop and diversify their financial markets by promoting new debt products.
Azmat, S., Skully, M., Kym, B., 2014. Issuer’s choice of Islamic bond type. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 28, 122–135
Byoun, S., 2008. How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets? J. Financ 63, 3069–3096
Eichengreen, B and P. Luengnaruemitchai. 2004. Why Doesn’t Asia have Bigger Bond Market. NBER Working Paper No. 10576 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Fama, E.F., French, K.R., 2002. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev. Finance. Stud. 15, 1–33.
Frank, M.Z., Goyal, V.K., 2003. Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. JFE. 67, 217–248
Gelos, G.R., Sahay, R., Sandleris, G., 2011. Sovereign borrowing by developing countries: what determines market access? J. Int. Econ. 83, 243–254.
Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. 2013. Sukuk vs. conventional bonds: A stock market perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 745–761.
Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. 2016. What influences stock market reaction to sukuk issues? The impact of scholars and sukuk types. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, (forthcoming).
Grassa, R. and Miniaoui, H. 2017. Corporate choice between conventional bond and Sukuk issuance evidence from GCC countries. Research in International Business and Finance (forthcoming)
Grigorian, D., 2003. On the Determinants of First-Time Sovereign Bond Issues. IMF Working Paper No. 03/184. Thomas (2009)
Huang, R., Ritter, J.R., 2009. Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 44, 237–271
Klein, P.O., Weill, L., 2015. Why do companies issue sukuk? Rev. Financ. Econ., 31, 26-33.
Lemmon, M.L., Roberts, M.R., Zender, J.F., 2008. Back to the beginning: persistence and the cross section of corporate capital structure. J. Financ. 63, 1575–1608.
Mohamed, et al., 2015. Why do issuers issue Sukuk or conventional bond? Evidence from Malaysian listed firms using partial adjustment models. Pac. Basin Finance J. 34, 233–252.
Nagano, M., 2016. Who issues sukuk and when?: An analysis of Islamic bond issuance determinants. Rev. Financ. Econ., 31, 45-55.
Nagano, M., 2017. Sukuk issuance and information asymmetry: Why do firms issue Sukuk?. Pac. Basin Finance J., 42, 142-157.
Presbitero, A.F., Ghura, D., Adedeji, O., Nije, L., 2016. Sovereign bonds in developing countries: Drivers of issuance and spreads. Rev. Dev. Financ. 6, 1–15
Said, A., & Grassa, R. 2013. The determinants of sukuk market development: does macroeconomic factors influence the construction of certain structure of sukuk? Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 3(5), 251–267.
Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.