Trends and Determinants of Sustainability Sukuk Issuance: Evidence from Global Markets
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 623
Download : 171
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite the growing prominence of sustainability sukuk in the global realm of sustainable finance, little is known about the dynamics of their issuance. This study is the first to document the evolution of sustainability sukuk issuance and explore the determinants of its size. Using a cross-country sukuk dataset comprising 11,944 issuances between 2012 (i.e., the year when the first sustainability sukuk was issued) to 2022, it highlights that sustainability sukuk remains a minuscule fraction of overall sukuk markets, and its rapid growth during the last recent years is mostly concentrated in Islamic finance-oriented countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia, while other developing Muslim-majority nations show limited participation. Examining determinants, we find that a higher security quality, a more extended debt structure, and major international currency denominations (e.g., USD and Euro) positively influence the size of the sustainability sukuk issue. Additionally, we uncover two unique drivers of sustainability sukuk issuance. The first is second party opinion, where its increased costs reduce issue size. The second is the underlying equity-based Islamic contracts, which encourage larger issuances compared to sale-based contracts. Our results also indicate that issuances by government entities and financial institutions, and those raised for social purposes rather than green projects, tend to be larger. Lastly, we find that a higher level of economic development and greater reliance on international trade in the issuing country may lead to a larger issue size. This paper concludes by calling for policies and incentives to encourage future sustainability sukuk issuance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author acknowledges the support of the Securities Commission Malaysia in awarding the fellowship at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, during which this paper was completed.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Aassouli, D., Asutay, M., Mohieldin, M., & Chiara Nwokike, T. (2018). Green Sukuk, Energy Poverty, and Climate Change A Roadmap for Sub-Saharan Africa. http://www.worldbank.org/
Abdullah, M. S., & Keshminder, J. S. (2022). What drives green sukuk? A leader’s perspective. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(3), 985–1005.
Alam, N., Duygun, M., & Ariss, R. T. (2016). Green sukuk: An innovation in Islamic capital markets. In Energy and finance: Sustainability in the energy industry (pp. 167-185). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Alexander, G. J., Edwards, A. K., & Ferri, M. G. (2000). The determinants of trading volume of high-yield corporate bonds. Journal of Financial Markets, 3(2), 177-204.
Alswaidan, M. W., Daynes, A., & Pasgas, P. (2017). Understanding and evaluation of risk in Sukuk structures. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(4), 389–405.
Ardalan, K. (2017). Capital structure theory: Reconsidered. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 696-710.
Aziz, S., Ashraf, D., & El-Khatib, R. (2021). Societal trust and Sukuk activity. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 74, 101384.
Barua, S., & Chiesa, M. (2019). Sustainable financing practices through green bonds: What affects the funding size? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1131–1147.
Bernini, F., & La Rosa, F. (2024). Research in the greenwashing field: Concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value. Journal of Management and Governance, 28(2), 405-444.
Cao, X., Jin, C., & Ma, W. (2021). Motivation of Chinese commercial banks to issue green bonds: financing costs or regulatory arbitrage? China Economic Review, 66, 101582.
Chiesa, M., & Barua, S. (2019). The surge of impact borrowing: The magnitude and determinants of green bond supply and its heterogeneity across markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 9(2), 138–161.
Cicchiello, A. F., Cotugno, M., Monferrà, S., & Perdichizzi, S. (2022). Which are the factors influencing green bonds issuance? Evidence from the European bonds market. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103190.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2023). The Climate Bonds expanded Standard and Certification Scheme. Accessible at https://www.climatebonds.net/certification
Dan, A., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2021). The determinants of green bond issuance in the European Union. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090446.
Diamond, D. W. (1991). Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 709–737.
Diamond‐Smith, N., Smith, K. R., & Hodoglugil, N. N. S. (2011). Climate change and population in the Muslim world. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 68(1), 1–8.
Eitrem, A., Meidell, A., & Modell, S. (2024). The use of institutional theory in social and environmental accounting research: A critical review. Accounting and Business Research, 54(7), 775-810.
Eyraud, L., Clements, B., & Wane, A. (2013). Green investment: Trends and determinants. Energy Policy, 60, 852–865.
Fatica, S., Panzica, R., & Rancan, M. (2021). The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special? Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100873.
Flammer, C. (2020). Green bonds: Effectiveness and implications for public policy. Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, 1(1), 95–128.
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213-231.
Friske, W., Hoelscher, S. A., & Nikolov, A. N. (2023). The impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on firm value: Insights from signaling theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(2), 372-392.
Guermazi, I. (2020). The determinants of sukūk issuance in GCC countries. Islamic Economic Studies, 28(1), 25-45.
Harjoto, M. A., Hoepner, A. G., & Nilsson, M. A. (2022). Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59(4), 1271-1301.
Jolink, A., & Niesten, E. (2021). Credibly reducing information asymmetry: Signaling on economic or environmental value by environmental alliances. Long Range Planning, 54(4), 101996.
Jonsdottir, G. E., Sigurjonsson, T. O., Alavi, A. R., & Mitchell, J. (2021). Applying responsible ownership to advance SDGs and the ESG framework, resulting in the issuance of green bonds. Sustainability, 13(13), 7331.
Keshminder, J. S., Abdullah, M. S., & Mardi, M. (2022). Green sukuk – Malaysia surviving the bumpy road: Performance, challenges and reconciled issuance framework. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(1), 76–94.
Liu, F. H., & Lai, K. P. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896-1914.
Liu, S., Qi, H., & Wan, Y. (2022). Driving factors behind the development of China's green bond market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131705.
Moratis, L. (2018). Signalling responsibility? Applying signalling theory to the ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility. Sustainability, 10(11), 4172.
Morgan Stanley (2017). Behind the Green Bond Boom. Accessible at https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/green-bond-boom
Nagano, M. (2016). Who issues Sukuk and when?: An analysis of the determinants of Islamic bond issuance. Review of Financial Economics, 31, 45-55.
Noordin, N. H., Haron, S. N., Hasan, A., & Hassan, R. (2018). Complying with the requirements for issuance of SRI sukuk: The case of Khazanah’s Sukuk Ihsan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(3), 415–433.
Refinitiv (2023). Green and Sustainability Sukuk Report 2022: Financing a Sustainable Future. Accessible at https://www-ams1.qa.refinitiv.com/en/resources/special-report/green-sustainability-sukuk-2022-financing-future
Richter, U. H., & Dow, K. E. (2017). Stakeholder theory: A deliberative perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4), 428-442.
Russo, A., Mariani, M., & Caragnano, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of green bond issuance: Going beyond the long-lasting debate on performance consequences. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 38–59.
Salah, O. (2010). Islamic finance: The impact of the AAOIFI resolution on equity-based sukuk structures. Law and Financial Markets Review, 4(5), 507–517.
Smaoui, H., & Khawaja, M. (2017). The determinants of sukuk market development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(7), 1501–1518.
Steigenberger, N. (2025). Deceptive signalling: Causes, consequences and remedies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(2), 283-305.
Studenmund, A. H. (2016). Using econometrics: A practical guide (6th International Ed.). In Pearson education. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Taj, S. A. (2016). Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. European Management Journal, 34(4), 338-348.
Tilling, M. V. (2004). Some thoughts on legitimacy theory in social and environmental accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 24(2), 3-7.
Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2020). Drivers of green bond market growth: The importance of Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement and implications for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118643.
Wang, Q., Zhou, Y., Luo, L., & Ji, J. (2019). Research on the factors affecting the risk premium of China’s green bond issuance. Sustainability, 11(22), 6394.
World Bank (2020). Pioneering the Green Sukuk: Three Years On. Accessible at https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/malaysia/publication/pioneering-the-green-sukuk-three-years-on
Wukich, J. J., Neuman, E. L., & Fogarty, T. J. (2024). Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(4), 673-701.
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
Zhu, Q., Zhao, X., & Wu, M. (2024). Third-party certification: How to effectively prevent greenwash in green bond market? – analysis based on signalling game. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 16173-16199.