PRINCIPAL-AGENT PREFERENCES IN IMPERFECT MARKET: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS ON MURABAHAH AND IJARAH
This paper aims to determine the optimal contract for the principal and the agentin imperfect market, when murabahah and ijarah are used. The financial contractingenforceability approach is employed to determine the contract that maximizes thevalue of the firm subject to agents’ constraints when the shock is low and high, andregarding market frictions. Furthermore, this approach allows us to assess the level ofmarket frictions that agents may bear in case of low shock and high shocks. Findingsreveal that the simulated values of the market frictions’ parameters for both contractsincrease when moving from the low shock to the high shock. Such evidence impliesthat the agent is more likely to cheat and hide significant information about the projectwhen the shock is high. As a response to this higher risk, the simulated values of theprofit margin parameters for the principal rise also when the shock is high in orderto compensate for the increase of market frictions and mitigate conflicts of interest.By comparing both contracts based on the simulated optimal values of the firm, it isnoticeable that the gap between both contracts is very tight, which can be attributedto their common debt-based financial arrangements. However, the results show thatijarah allows the principal and the agent to generate the highest value in case of lowshock and high shock, comparing to murabahah. Therefore, ijarah seems to be moreattractive for the principal and the agent than murabahah.
Atkeson, A. (1991). “International Lending with Moral Hazard and Risk of Repudiation”, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp 1069–1089Bedoui, H. and Mansour, W. (2015), “Performance and Maqasid al-Shari’ah’s pentagon-shaped ethical measurement”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 555-576.Ben Amar, A. (2018), “An Old Wine in New Shari’a Compliant Bottles? A Time- frequency Wavelet Analysis of the Efficiency of Monetary Policy in Dual Financial Systems”, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 38, No 1, pp. 558-564Chhapra, I. U., Ahmed, A., Rehan, R., & Hussain, F. (2018). “Consumer’s Preference and Awareness: Comparative Analysis Between Conventional and Islamic Ijarah Auto Financing in Pakistan”. Journal of Islamic Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 389 – 402.Chichti, J. and Mansour, W. (2010-a). “Is the Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity Still Useful to Gauge Financing Constrains?” International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Vol.3, No. 1, pp. 71-84Chichti, J. and Mansour, W. (2010-b). “Investment, Marginal Q, and Net Worth: Evidence from Europe.” IUP Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 5–50.Chichti, J. and Mansour, W. (2012). “Investment Lumpiness and Networth: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 145-162.Coase, R, (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, Vol 4, No. 16, pp. 386–405. Cooley, T., Marimon, R. and Quadrini, V. (2004). “Aggregate Consequences ofLimited Contract Enforceability”. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 112, No. 4, pp. 817–847.Dar, H., and Presley, J. (2000). “Lack of Profit Loss Sharing in Islamic Banking: Management and Control Imbalances”, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, Vol. 2, No, 0, pp. 9–12Ernawati, E. (2016), “Risk of Profit Loss Financing: The Case of Indonesia”. Al- Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, (Journal of Islamic Economics), Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 101-116.Evans, D. (1987). “Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth”, Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 95, No. 1, pp. 657-647Ebrahim, M. and Sheikh, M. (2016). “Debt Instruments in Islamic Finance: A Critique”, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 185-198.Farooq, O. (2007). “Partnership, Equity-Financing and Islamic Finance: Whither Profit-Loss Sharing?” International Association for Eslamic economics, Vol. 11, (Special Issue), pp. 67–88Fatwa Dewan Syari’ah Nasional No: 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 Tentang Murabahah. Gale, D. and Hellwing, M. (1985). “Incentive-Compatible Debt Contracts - The One-Period Problem.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 647–663.Hanif, M. (2016) “Economic Substance or Legal Form: An Evaluation of Islamic Finance Practice”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.277-295.Hart, O. (1989). “An Economist ’s Perspective on the Theory of the Firm”. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 7, pp.1757–1774. ———. (1995). Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, 1st Editio. Calaredon Press OXFORD, ed.,———. (2003), “Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks and an Application to Public-Private partnerships”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 486, pp. 69- 76———. (2017), “Incomplete Contracts and Control”, American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 7, pp.1731-1752.Hart, O. and Moore, J (1994). “A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp.841–879.Hashmi, Omar A., (2009), “Islamic Home Finance in the United States: Solution or Deception?” Howard Law Journal, 52.Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), (2018), Financing by Type of Shari’ah Compliant Contract, https://www.ifsb.org/psifi_02.phpJensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.305–360.Khan, Babar et al, (2015). “Comparison of Islamic and Conventional Banking Practices Regarding House Finance in Pakistan: A Case of Hazara Decision”, Academic Research International, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 251-261.Kehoe, T., Levine, D. (1993). “Debt-Constrained Asset Markets”. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, No. (4), pp. 865–888.Khong, Y., Cheng, L., Tan, K., (2018), “A Study on the Level of Acceptance towards the Islamic Home Financing: Empirical Study in Malaysia”, Research in Economics and Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 45-67.Lone, A. and Quadir, A. (2017), “Incentive Structure of Financing a Project: An Islamic Finance Approach”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 87-91Maghrebi, N. and Mirakhor, A. (2015). “Risk Sharing and Shared Prosperity in Islamic Finance”. Islamic Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.85–115.Majdoub, J. and Mansour, W. (2014), “Islamic Equity Market Integration and Volatility Spillover between Emerging and US Stock Markets”, North-American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 29, No.3, pp. 452-470.Majdoub, J., Mansour, W. and Arrak, I. (2018), “Volatility Spillover among Equity Indexes and Crude Oil Prices: Evidence from Islamic Markets”, Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27-45.Majdoub, J., Mansour, W. and Jouini, J. (2016), “Market Integration between Conventional and Islamic Stock Prices”, North-American Journal of Economics and Finance. Vol. 37, pp. 436-457.Mansour, W. (2014). “Information Asymmetry and Financing Constraints in GCC.” Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Vol. 11, pp. 19–29Mansour, W., Ben Abdelhamid, M. and Heshmati, A. (2015), “Recursive Profit and Loss sharing”, Journal of Risk, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 21-50Marcet, A., Marimon, R. (1992). “Communication, Commitment, and Growth”. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 219–249
Mehri, M. Jouaber, K. and & Hassan, M., (2017). “Profit- Sharing Ratio as a Screening device in Venture Capital,” Edward Elgar Publishing, Handbook of Empirical Research on Islam and Economic Life, pp. 579-601.Muda, R. and Ismail, A. (2010), “Profit-Loss Sharing and Value Creation in Islamic Banks”. Journal of Business and Policy Research. Vol 5. No. 2, pp. 262-281Muhammad, M. (2014), “Critical Analysis of Some of the Major Internal Hindrance Factors in the Application of Musharakah Financing by the Islamic Banks”. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 125-142Nabi, S. (2012). “Profit Sharing, Income Inequality and Capital Accumulation”. IRTI working paper, (21200).Quintin, E. (2003). “Limited Enforcement and the Organization of Production”. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 1222–1245Ross, S. (1973). “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 134–39.Sapuan, N. (2016), “An Evolution of Mudarabah Contract: A Viewpoint from Classical and Contemporary Islamic Scholars”, Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol. 35, pp. 349-358Sharia’h Advisory Council, (2009). Draft of Sharia’h Parameter, Reference 1, Murabahah, Bank Negara MalaysiaSharia’h Advisory Council, (2009). Draft of Sharia’h Parameter, Reference 2, Ijarah, bank Negara MalaysiaShofawati, A., (2014), “Murabahah Financing in Islamic Banking: Case Study in Indonesia”, Proceedings of 5th Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference 17 – 18, Hotel Istana, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, ISBN: 978-1-922069-44-3Smith, A. (1776). “The Wealth of Nations.”Stokey, N. and Lucas, R. (1989), Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics, Harvard University Press.Tauchen, G. (1986). “Finite State Markov-chain Approximations to Univariate and Vector Autoregressions”. Economics Letters, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.177–181.Tirole, J. (1999). “Incomplete Contracts: Where Do We Stand?”, Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 741–81Wahla, A., Hasan, H., Ishaq Bhatti, M. (2018) “Measures of Customers’ Perception of Car Ijarah Financing”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 2-16.Williamson, O. (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 233–261.
Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.