SAY NO TO INFLATION TARGETING: A CALL FOR THE ADAPTATION OF A ZERO-INTEREST REGIME

  • Atiq ur Rehman University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
Keywords: Central bank, Inflation targeting, Sustainable development goals, Zero interest.

Abstract

In its early history, monetary policy focused on numerous objectives, including stable growth, full employment, stable exchange rates and price stability. In the 1990s, many countries shifted their monetary policy framework from monetary aggregate/interest rate targeting to inflation targeting, in which inflation was regarded as the primary target of monetary policy, and interest rates the primary tool for achieving target inflation. Inflation targeting has diverted the focus of central banks from growth and employment to price stability. Unfortunately, there is considerable evidence which shows that inflation targeting frameworks are unable to control inflation in the way central banks want, and in fact lead to a greater departure from optimal growth and employment, the two key targets of sustainable development goals (SDGs). There is also evidence suggesting a strong association between inflation targeting and the move away from several other SDGs. Employing a systematic review of the related literature and Granger causality tests applied to data from various countries, this paper shows that inflation targeting fails to control inflation and has several undesirable impacts on a wide range of socioeconomic indicators. It is argued that the zero-interest regime is the optimal regime with respect to the impact on socioeconomic indicators, and also supports the interest free economy advocated by Islam.

References

Barth, M. J., & Ramey, V. A. (2001). The Cost channel of monetary transmission. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16(2001). MIT Press.

Chowdhury, I., Hoffmann, M., & Schabert, A. (2006). Inflation dynamics and the cost channel of monetary transmission. European Economic Review, 50(4), 995-1016.

Christian, J. W. (1968). A further analysis of the objectives of American monetary policy. The Journal of Finance, 23(3), 465-477.

Easterly, W., & Fischer, S. (2001). Inflation and the Poor. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(2), 160-178.

Epstein, G. (2007). Central banks, inflation targeting and employment creation. Economic and Labour Market Papers, ILO, 2007/2.

Fawley, B. W., & Neely, C. J. (2013). Four stories of quantitative easing. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 95(1), 51-88.

Fowler, S. J. (2005). Income inequality, monetary policy, and the business cycle. Computing in Economics and Finance, 184.

Gibson, A. H. (1923). The future course of high-class investment values. Banker’s Magazine, January, 15-34.

IMF. (2005). Fact sheet: Monetary policy and central banking. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Factsheets/English/MonetaryPolicy.ashx.

Keynes, J. M. (1930). Treatise of money, Vol. 2. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

Langdana, F. K. (2004). Macroeconomic policy: Demystifying monetary and fiscal policy. New York: Springer.

Mersch, Y. (2014). Monetary policy and economic inequality. Keynote Speech at Corporate Credit Conference, Zurich, October 17.

Milne, W. J., & Torous, W. N. (1984). Long-term interest rates and the price level: The Canadian evidence on the Gibson Paradox. Canadian Journal of Economics, 17(2), 327-339.

Ministry of Finance (2019). Pakistan economic survey. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance.

Mishkin, F. S. (2007). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial markets. Toronto: Pearson Education.

Nordhaus, W. D. (1973). The effects of inflation on the distribution of economic welfare. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 5(1), 465-504.

Phillips, A. W. (1958). The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957. Economica, 25(100), 283-299.

Ravenna, F., & Walsh, C. E. (2006). Optimal monetary policy with the cost channel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(2), 199–216.

Rehman, A. (2015). Revival of legacy of Tooke and Gibson: Implications for monetary policy. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 4(2), 37-58.

Rehman, A. (2017). Revival of legacy of Tooke and Gibson: Further evidence and implications for monetary policy. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 6(3), 127-142.

Romer, C. D. & Romer D. H. (1999). Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor. In J. Rabin & G. L. Stevens (Eds.), Handbook of monetary policy (pp. 21-49). Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Rothbard, M. N. (1994). Austrian economics: Tensions and new directions. Southern Economic Journal, 61(2), 559-561.

Samuelson, P. A., & Solow, R. M. (1960). Analytical aspects of anti-inflation policy. The American Economic Review, 50(2), 177-194.

Shiller, R. J., & Siegel, J. J. (1977). The Gibson paradox and historical movements in real interest rates. Journal of Political Economy, 85(5), 891-907.

Sims, C. A. (1992). Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review, 36(5), 975-1000.

Tillmann, P. (2008). Do interest rates drive inflation dynamics? An analysis of the cost channel of monetary transmission. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 32(9), 2723-2744.

Tooke, T. (1838). A history of prices, and of the state of the circulation, from 1793 to 1837: Preceded by a brief sketch of the state of corn trade in the last two centuries (Vol. 7). London: Spottiswoode and Shaw.

Published
2021-08-31
How to Cite
Rehman, A. (2021). SAY NO TO INFLATION TARGETING: A CALL FOR THE ADAPTATION OF A ZERO-INTEREST REGIME. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(3), 561 - 582. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i3.1366
Section
Articles